.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

a clipblog collecting blogged thoughts on visual poetry

Monday, May 21, 2007


via Ron Silliman's blog:

A second Saroyan type that comes closer to Grenier entails poems that utilize the graphic elements of language – the poem at the top of this note is a famous instance of this. As it does there, this kind of poem works when there is some intelligible connection – it doesn’t have to be articulatable – between what is going on the page and denotative & connotative dimensions of the word at hand. Thus


strikes me as effective precisely for the way it calls up the double-image element involved in stereoscopic vision, why humans see in 3D, whereas


just sits there on the page doing not much of anything.


via Nathan Austin's This Cruellest Month:

But exclusive attention to these poems' graphical components ignores — as Silliman does — their sonic dimensions. I'm not interested in disagreeing with Silliman, of course; his attention is focused on the visual by the parameters of his essay, and particularly by his comparison of Saroyan with Grenier. Rather, and nevertheless, I want to look at other ways of reading the poems to investigate them differently.

Labels: , , , , ,


Anonymous Steve said...

There's more on the Saroyan poem here, and here, if you're interested.

9:58 AM, May 25, 2007


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home